The real difference between a leader and a manager |

Here’s an excerpt from THE SENSEI LEADER – Save 20% –– order here!

“One reason corporate and governmental bureaucracies stagnate is the assumption by line executives that given their rank and authority, they can lead without being leaders. They cannot. They can be given subordinates, but they cannot be given a following. “A following must be earned.” ~John W. Gardner

The Sensei must earn the authority vested in him by his students…

There are plenty of talented martial artists that make lousy teachers. I believe you’ll find the same problem everywhere leadership is important- especially in business and politics. There is an epidemic of people infecting positions of authority who may have outstanding domain knowledge or even a record of high performance in other positions, but still make lousy leaders. This leads us to the tired debate over leadership versus management. Managerial skills are by nature more technical and functionary. Those skills are very useful in managing process.

Leadership skills are those that make you more effective in your relationships with- people.

Management always refers to a position of authority- a title. That title or position is almost always conferred by superiors or advisors and may or may not involve input from subordinates. You can claim authority simply by acquiring a title and convincing others that you know more than they do. You can dictate a strict culture full of perfunctory rituals that reinforce your authority, status and position. You can attain a position of authority by being a jerk! You can increase authority through political maneuvering, lying and cheating. Leadership, on the other hand, is always dependent on acknowledgement from subordinates and peers. No followers- no leader! Authority is always limited by the willingness of the people under you to share their talents and abilities.